Your own words will hang you:
Your arguement is that the bet has multiple interpretations. My friendly advice is to stop digging and figure out a way to make this rightThe first level headed person to weigh in acknowledges that the bet can be interpreted multiple ways. Although he ultimately sides with Vegas, he attempts to mitigate the loss amount by acknowledging that the bet was not clear and concise per both parties. ***Also known as ambiguous***
The fact of the matter is that I accepted the bet on the premise that both words would be used in the same post as this is precisely what was offered. Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation.
Also, you should probably realize that I'm the closest to your version of facts in this thread (which isn't all that close but is still better than anyone else is giving you) coming at me as your main instigator is probably the worst decision you could make