jsearles and Chinamaniac debate about the value of his WSOP pieces

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steve-O

You do realize that if your claim is the statement is ambiguous than that cuts both ways right? Even if you're right that there are multiple interpretations, you're wrong in that Vegas would owe you money for the very same reason...

The absolute best you could ever hope for is the best is cancelled, you would never be entitled money

---

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said the offer was ambiguous. I think the offer made was very clear and concise:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vegas1369

How about I find, lets say 15 posts, where you have used those two words incorrectly?

---

---

Your own words will hang you:

Quote:

---

The first level headed person to weigh in acknowledges that the bet can be interpreted multiple ways. Although he ultimately sides with Vegas, he attempts to mitigate the loss amount by acknowledging that the bet was not clear and concise per both parties. ***Also known as ambiguous***

The fact of the matter is that I accepted the bet on the premise that both words would be used in the same post as this is precisely what was offered. Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation.

---

Your arguement is that the bet has multiple interpretations. My friendly advice is to stop digging and figure out a way to make this right

Also, you should probably realize that I'm the closest to your version of facts in this thread (which isn't all that close but is still better than anyone else is giving you) coming at me as your main instigator is probably the worst decision you could make

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZtd2FwEhX0
1:00 mark, listen to Ivey.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steve-O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said the offer was ambiguous. I think the offer made was very clear and concise:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vegas1369

How about I find, lets say 15 posts, where you have used those two words incorrectly?

---

---

Your own words will hang you:

Quote:

---

The first level headed person to weigh in acknowledges that the bet can be interpreted multiple ways. Although he ultimately sides with Vegas, he attempts to mitigate the loss amount by acknowledging that the bet was not clear and concise per both parties. ***Also known as ambiguous***

The fact of the matter is that I accepted the bet on the premise that both words would be used in the same post as this is precisely what was offered. Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation.

---

Your arguement is that the bet has multiple interpretations. My friendly advice is to stop digging and figure out a way to make this right

---

You have continually argued the bet was ambiguous, I have repeatedly said that I feel the bet was clear and concise. I said I accepted the bet "precisely" as it was offered. If you are getting ambiguous out of my mouth then you are just wanting to believe the web you have wove. I simply acknowledged your opinion, I didn't marry myself to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steve-O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said the offer was ambiguous. I think the offer made was very clear and concise:

---

Your own words will hang you:

Quote:

---

The first level headed person to weigh in acknowledges that the bet can be interpreted multiple ways. Although he ultimately sides with Vegas, he attempts to mitigate the loss amount by acknowledging that the bet was not clear and concise per both parties. ***Also known as ambiguous***

The fact of the matter is that I accepted the bet on the premise that both words would be used in the same post as this is precisely what was offered. Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation.

---

Your arguement is that the bet has multiple interpretations. My friendly advice is to stop digging and figure out a way to make this right

---

You have continually argued the bet was ambiguous, I have repeatedly said that I feel the bet was clear and concise. I said I accepted the bet "precisely" as it was offered. If you are getting ambiguous out of my mouth then you are just wanting to believe the web you have wove. I simply acknowledged your opinion, I didn't marry myself to it.

---

Wow, change your avatar to a washing machine you're doing so much spinning. I officially wash my hands of this and will no longer offer you the best potential outcome and advice you have gotten so far...

From your own mouth

Quote:

---

Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation

---

Meaning there is another interpretation!The REAL one

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steve-O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Steve-O

Your own words will hang you:

Quote:

---

The first level headed person to weigh in acknowledges that the bet can be interpreted multiple ways. Although he ultimately sides with Vegas, he attempts to mitigate the loss amount by acknowledging that the bet was not clear and concise per both parties. ***Also known as ambiguous***

The fact of the matter is that I accepted the bet on the premise that both words would be used in the same post as this is precisely what was offered. Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation.

---

Your arguement is that the bet has multiple interpretations. My friendly advice is to stop digging and figure out a way to make this right

---

You have continually argued the bet was ambiguous, I have repeatedly said that I feel the bet was clear and concise. I said I accepted the bet "precisely" as it was offered. If you are getting ambiguous out of my mouth then you are just wanting to believe the web you have wove. I simply acknowledged your opinion, I didn't marry myself to it.

---

Wow, change your avatar to a washing machine you're doing so much spinning. I officially wash my hands of this and will no longer offer you the best potential outcome and advice you have gotten so far...

From your own mouth

Quote:

---

Steve-O acknowledges that this is a legit interpretation

---

Meaning there is another interpretation!The REAL one

---

guess they didnt offer intro to logic 101 @ Missouri Western State University

im really not sure what searles deal is with betting people, it looks like he's chalking up quite a negative reputation. You have this fiasco then the china fiasco and before augusta people were talking about how many majors rory would get in his career, I clearly stated under 5 life time and he fires at me if I want rory +2 on the season.

If I have Rory pegged at U5 lifetime why in the fuck would I bet +2 on the season lmao, I'm positive other people have experienced some stupidity from this guy but it appears like the kid is betting illiterate.

Wait.... so you didn't realize that you were the mark in lewfather's don't knock the hustle post? Seriously?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RealTalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?

---

Finally someone's sides with me. I saw Vegas slip up and I pounced. Don't playa hate, congratulate.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

[ ] siding with jsearles

---

just so you can piece this together you fucking mongoloid...

yeah your interpretation of things is pretty rock solid...

---

shout out to realtalk, this got glossed over but he picked up on it right away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jasep

Wait.... so you didn't realize that you were the mark in lewfather's don't knock the hustle post? Seriously?

---

The "druff better then china" tag is gold.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jasep

Wait.... so you didn't realize that you were the mark in lewfather's don't knock the hustle post? Seriously?

---

Nope, I actuallly thought that my arch nemesis Lewfather had all of a sudden come to my rescue like a knight in shining armour. Jesus Christ, are you guys seriously that foolish?

are you still confusing me with hockey guy? only because of your retardation did I have to spank that ass, n-word. Move along, zero fucks are given about you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

are you still confusing me with hockey guy? only because of your retardation did I have to spank that ass, n-word. Move along, zero fucks are given about you.

---

Nope, you are now my arch nemesis. I forgot all about Hockey Guy as he is seemingly napping it out like the douchebag that he is. You however are still an epic failure of a poster. The only thing you have done right recently is getting the 4s.

And Im not sure why you felt compelled to put ass, n-word, and fuck in the same post so close together. It seems to me that you have some affinity with those three things together simultaneously?

I'm pretty sure hockeyguy is in Ireland visiting, atleast thats the last thing I remember him saying on the boards myself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

I'm pretty sure hockeyguy is in Ireland visiting, atleast thats the last thing I remember him saying on the boards myself.

---

You are right, I do remember that now. What a lucky fucking douchebag he is

Slow day at work ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

Slow day at work ?

---

Still a raging douche that can only resort to my facebook profile I see?
Are you jealous that I got a job that requires a college degree considering you having seemingly failed at everything in life?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lewfather

Slow day at work ?

---

Still a raging douche that can only resort to my facebook profile I see?
Are you jealous that I got a job that requires a college degree considering you having seemingly failed at everything in life?

---

You're a scammer, your information needs to be outed so that we can get vegas his money in a timely fashion. The community and these boards need to be aware of your scamming actions. So yes, we are going to take all necessary avenues to get Vegas paid in full to his settled upon amount of $450 dollars. We can put you on a payment schedule if need be.

Isn't your job involving rent-a-cop security people?

LOL @ acting like that job requires a college degree, a friend of mine was offered a job with them and he is borderline retarded. On top of that, what kind of college offers English classes that you can graduate from when you don't understand basic rules; like the difference between "then" and "than"?