:deniedQuote:
Originally Posted by Jasep
! Will you agree to have Steve o locate that arbitrator with the promise of not.swaying his opinion in advance and then comply with whatever the ruling would be?Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22or 4) have a fair and impartial arbitor rule in my favorQuote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
obv only jsearles would be qualified to choose a fair and impartial arbitrator
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-ONo, because the clear consensus is that the bet was intended as Vegas interpreted it; Searles is in the minority (of one???) on that point. I don't think anyoned could argue that Searles version is the correct one. That said, the fact that Vegas was willing to settle for $450 after learning of Searles interpretation shows that the technicality is there --but it's still a technicality and not enough to cancel the bet in my opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandwich
Since Searles wants the bet cancelled, and will never allow me to arbitrate, I was leaning towards him owing $250 (the original bet amount for 15 posts) and possibly some posting restrictions like creating threads or responding to threads involving China, Vegas, et al. And possibly an admonission that he lost the bet (if this was important to Vegas)
I dont want the bet canceled, I never said I wanted the bet canceled.
I could do this as well. I would be happy to find someone who knows nothing of you two or the bet, send them all pertinent posts in this thread and let them decide.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasep! Will you agree to have Steve o locate that arbitrator with the promise of not.swaying his opinion in advance and then comply with whatever the ruling would be?Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22or 4) have a fair and impartial arbitor rule in my favorQuote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
Vegas would never owe you money from your interpretation of the bet... you do realize you are the only person in this thread who has that interpretation, and I'd bet only a few even see it as the most miniscule of technicalitesQuote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
I dont want the bet canceled, I never said I wanted the bet canceled.
Both Vegas and Searles need to escrow the $500 prior to any arbitration. It would really be a shame if one of the two was freerolling the other.
Pretty crazy how Vegas picked up on Searles using then instead of than 100% of the time, wtf.
Even crazier is how he got Searles to accept a $500 bet knowing damn well he hasn't written than since kindergarten.
Really?
Should of escrow'd the $500 first but it was a time sensitive hustle.
How crazy would it be if Vegas actually counted and bookmarked the errors before even offering the bet, then acting like he's slaving around the clock to find them, bonafide hustler imo.
:thisQuote:
Originally Posted by I V
you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?
nice. reminded me of this radio prank, some of you may remember, since a lot of you are in the 'AAF area, and I think this made the Herald, at least:Quote:
Originally Posted by SandwichI believe PLOL brought us this nugget:Quote:
Originally Posted by Serial Fail
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIht452mxb8
LO Fucking L!!! Aside from someone with downs syndrome, no sane person would rule in your favor here, scammer. Pay up.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22or 4) have a fair and impartial arbitor rule in my favorQuote:
Originally Posted by Steve-OYes, I ruled against you, but I'm also willing to possibly lighten your burden (although it would probably come with non-monetary stipulations agreed to by Vegas). In all honesty that is probably the best you could ever hope for here.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
Your options seem to be:
1) Have someone mediate an agreement between you and Vegas
2) Have your name and reputation smeared and "Santorumed" by Google
3) Pay the full amount
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe Diddlynice. reminded me of this radio prank, some of you may remember, since a lot of you are in the 'AAF area, and I think this made the Herald, at least:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandwich
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIht452mxb8
Jesus Christ. "I got this old beat up truck, I ma gonna get a new one."
I only offered to knock the $50 off because I was tired of having to read through all of his posts. It was worth $50 for me not to do that. In no way was this discount because of his angle shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
That's your interpretation of the reasoning behind your decision ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by vegas1369I only offered to knock the $50 off because I was tired of having to read through all of his posts. It was worth $50 for me not to do that. In no way was this discount because of his angle shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O
Finally someone's sides with me. I saw Vegas slip up and I pounced. Don't playa hate, congratulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lewfather
you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?
As Jsearles attorney I declare the bet void since there's no way for Jsearles to know with certainty that Vegas didn't count the grammar errors in question ahead of offering the bet. It would be a very easy thing to do and the unusually large bet size is very suspicious. Also there is no way for Jsearles to know with if Vegas would of paid up had he lost.
Bet void, escrow in the future.
You do realize that if your claim is the statement is ambiguous than that cuts both ways right? Even if you're right that there are multiple interpretations, you're wrong in that Vegas would owe you money for the very same reason...Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Finally someone's sides with me. I saw Vegas slip up and I pounced. Don't playa hate, congratulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lewfather
you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?
The absolute best you could ever hope for is the bet is cancelled, you would never be entitled money
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Finally someone's sides with me. I saw Vegas slip up and I pounced. Don't playa hate, congratulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lewfather
you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?
you cant be this stupid...just not possible
[ ] siding with jsearles
Don't put words in my mouth. I never said the offer was ambiguous. I think the offer made was very clear and concise:Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-OYou do realize that if your claim is the statement is ambiguous than that cuts both ways right? Even if you're right that there are multiple interpretations, you're wrong in that Vegas would owe you money for the very same reason...Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
The absolute best you could ever hope for is the best is cancelled, you would never be entitled money
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas1369
Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_RussiaPretty crazy how Vegas picked up on Searles using then instead of than 100% of the time, wtf.
Even crazier is how he got Searles to accept a $500 bet knowing damn well he hasn't written than since kindergarten.
Really?
Should of escrow'd the $500 first but it was a time sensitive hustle.
How crazy would it be if Vegas actually counted and bookmarked the errors before even offering the bet, then acting like he's slaving around the clock to find them, bonafide hustler imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22Finally someone's sides with me. I saw Vegas slip up and I pounced. Don't playa hate, congratulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lewfather
you see a mark you take him down, do you tell the fish at your table he shouldnt be playing ace rag like that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewfather
just so you can piece this together you fucking mongoloid...
yeah your interpretation of things is pretty rock solid...