Originally Posted by gut
The only thing I got out of reading this thread is Jesap is the biggest faggot on the internet. lol at the line of credit comment...then again, jesap is making high five figures doing storage wars..
Wait so Searles wins the bet because of a error in the wording of the bet? Wow what a slowroll by Searles. Searles, my attorney fees are $100, just saying.
Duddly you fucked this bet up. No one was talking combo until you blurted it out in this thread. Way to go Duddly, way to go.
In my mind the mis-use of then or than is the issue, not that it's used in the same post.
Last edited by limitles; 05-22-2012 at 09:23 PM.
Exactly.Duddly you fucked this bet up. No one was talking combo until you blurted it out in this thread. Way to go Duddly, way to go.
In my mind the mis-use of then or than is the issue not that it's used in the same post.
If you use then in the place of than, then you are using both words incorrectly. Anyone that interprets what I said to mean otherwise is a fucking idiot. There was no error in how it was presented, and obv the vast majority here agrees with me on that, except of course the one asshole who lost the bet.
As far as the judges, Jsearles already agreed that it would be Druff, Tony and Steve-O before the bet was made, and Jsearles booked the bet with them as the established judges. There is no going back and saying the shit he is saying about bringing in an impartial arbitrator, HE ALREADY FUCKING AGREED TO THOSE 3 GUYS. Just another angle shoot from this complete scumbag.
Also, for those of you calling me faggot for going through his posts, I somewhat agree, but this is why I made the bet for such a high amount. That was the number I felt it would take for me to go through such a faggoty task. If I was wrong, so be it.... I felt pretty strongly I wasn't, but I needed a high risk/reward for this to go down.
Pay up scammer.
Here ye, here ye, I am finally free to review this dispute and pass judgement.
Jsearles, I assure you that I will put any personal feelings aside and render a fair judgement.
More to follow.......
Fuck me there are a lot of pages here, this may take a while...
Please show where I acknowledged and agreed to those 3? You offering isn't me accepting. Please show where I say "sure, I think those three are fair"?Exactly.
If you use then in the place of than, then you are using both words incorrectly. Anyone that interprets what I said to mean otherwise is a fucking idiot. There was no error in how it was presented, and obv the vast majority here agrees with me on that, except of course the one asshole who lost the bet.
As far as the judges, Jsearles already agreed that it would be Druff, Tony and Steve-O before the bet was made, and Jsearles booked the bet with them as the established judges. There is no going back and saying the shit he is saying about bringing in an impartial arbitrator, HE ALREADY FUCKING AGREED TO THOSE 3 GUYS. Just another angle shoot from this complete scumbag.
Also, for those of you calling me faggot for going through his posts, I somewhat agree, but this is why I made the bet for such a high amount. That was the number I felt it would take for me to go through such a faggoty task. If I was wrong, so be it.... I felt pretty strongly I wasn't, but I needed a high risk/reward for this to go down.
Pay up scammer.
Skimmed thread, but why in God's name would you not escrow before? Does this guy seem like the type that would ship you $500 even if he had it?
You booked the bet AFTER I nominated them as judges you fucking idiot, that is you accepting. You really don't know how bets are conducted, do you? Pathetic.Please show where I acknowledged and agreed to those 3? You offering isn't me accepting. Please show where I say "sure, I think those three are fair"?
It is so amazing watching you flounder around in this thread like a dying fish out of water. I have never seen someone so immune to being told he is wrong by literally everyone on this board, and continue on the way you do. It's fucking disgusting.
Pay up scammer.
I agree now, bad move on my part. For some stupid reason I gave him more credit than this.
How can Jsearles be certain you didn't take 10 minutes and count up his then/than errors before proposing a wager?
Yeah you better pretend i'm invisible and duck that question.
I know people who will do shit like that, they play the I'm honest role very well too, just saying.
You got to escrow any thing over a $100 these days and this was just not a good bet since you could easily angle shoot.
This is as far as I am right now but
Lulzfather is god
I'm not saying I agree that Vegas cheated buuuuuuuuuuuuuutt:
That was hours before the bet was consumated.
I would like to add that BCR should also arbitrate this dispute.
Jason, can I assume by your post that you accept me as a mediator who will render a fair decision? I will hold off until you confirm.
tags are god. makes the board so much better, subtly.
I'm not a technicality guy, and we all know what the "spirit" of the wager Vegas proposed was, but I could in no way be considered impartial as I have a strong positive opinion of Vegas, and he'll probably be the first person I will party with next time out west. I could be impartial with probably 99% of the posters here, but the first two that have been in question (Willie and Vegas) are among a small handful with which I have spoken to privately, beyond forum banter, and are simply two of the main reasons I'm even involved with the community anymore. I happen to agree with Vegas here, but in the event I didn't, I wouldn't call him out on it either, so I'm certainly biased.
bracket geek?
God you are such a fucking asshole. If you were concerned with this then you would have never made the bet to begin with, and you KNOW you are taking that quote out of context now and trying to make it look like something it wasn't.I'm not saying I agree that Vegas cheated buuuuuuuuuuuuuutt:
That was hours before the bet was consumated.
FPS, I am not ducking your question...lol. Here is the deal. Try running a search on "then" on Jsearles22 and you will see it is impossible, the search function won't allow it, it is too common. I had to go through each and every one of his posts looking for these errors... LOL at that shit taking 10 minutes, it took me over 2 hours, maybe 3. Which brings me to my next point. I did not start looking for these errors until last night when we started the bet, which was about an hour after I had gotten home from work. I had to be at work yesterday morning at 8am, and had a long ass day and didn't get home till close to 8pm. That is when I started talking again about this bet with him and made this post...
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...ll=1#post18978
Another point... This isn't even an issue, jsearles clearly had no qualms about this when he booked the bet. If it was an issue for him he would not have accepted the bet to begin with. You can't come in now, after the bet was made, and say "oh, well what if you did this, or that, that's cheating". That's ridiculous, but again, not an issue because I did not cheat in anyway to begin with, and the bet was booked without your point even being an issue.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
