Quote Originally Posted by jsearles22 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by lewfather View Post


If you accept a wager and lose, whether or not you understood it to whichever interpretation of your your choosing is irrelevant. Pretty sure if you don't pay or come to some agreement with Vegas you're going to get slapped with the scammer atleast to some degree a variation of it ie welcher.

Is $500 worth being trashed? I guess it's just the internet but not really a smart game to be playing.

Who said I lost?

Quote Originally Posted by Steve-O
Personally, I think he is doing alright, and actually has a valid arguement for the cancellation of the bet, or a reduction in the amount of it... like I said 200 posts ago
Quote Originally Posted by T-bags
This will not be a popular decision, but I believe that both Vegas and Searles agreed to different bets, therefore the bet should be voided and cancelled.
why do you keep quoting these guys when you already declined to use them as arbitrators? all the sudden their opinion is one you value and want to use to bolster your case? when they offered to arb you were adamant they could not be trusted as fair and unbiased.

you keep spinning and dodging and deflecting instead of sacking up and settling on an arbitrator. its clear that you and vegas do not agree on the terms or results of this bet. both of you are gigantic morons for not clarifying and not using escrow(vegas moreso than you on this one).

but the fact still remains that when a bet is in dispute, the only way to come to a conclusion is arbitration. you keep saying you cant get a fair arb, but still have not nominated anyone that you would deem as fair. you even claim druff could not be unbiased as he has been outspoken on your terrible-ness as a poster recently...yet somehow say you are waiting for him to weigh in on this matter?

stop being an attention whore and start trying to offer legit solutions to get this bullshit settled and off the front page.