Proposal: Searles Vs Vegas

[LLL]

It seems clear to me that jsearles is not interested in actually settling this $500 matter.

It also seems clear that he seems to enjoy the attention that comes from the whole matter, and is intentionally dragging this out for as long as possible.

If he said, "I disagree I owe you $500, and I'm never going to pay, end of discussion", I would think he was being really shitty, but at least wasn't trying to rub salt in the wounds.

I believe he is using this situation as a means of trolling, and everyone is sick of it, myself included.

I am going to ban his ability to post until he proposes a plan to solve this, via PM (to me), and sticks to it. That is, some sort of escrow will need to have occurred before he can post again here. The escrow doesn't have to be to me.

BTW, handicapme, I don't understand your threat to donate to skatz or VPR. Go ahead and donate to them. I am not in competition with either of those forums, especially VPR.

To be honest, I had very limited time on the internet over the past 1-2 weeks, which is why my posting here was pretty much been reduced to infrequent, short messages during that time. It's also why I couldn't do radio on Tuesday. I would read some threads here and there, but didn't even get to read this one until today.

Also, anyone is welcome to quote anyone else's (actual) messages in their signature.

[Crowe Diddly]

It seems clear to me that jsearles is not interested in actually settling this $500 matter.

It also seems clear that he seems to enjoy the attention that comes from the whole matter, and is intentionally dragging this out for as long as possible.

If he said, "I disagree I owe you $500, and I'm never going to pay, end of discussion", I would think he was being really shitty, but at least wasn't trying to rub salt in the wounds.

I believe he is using this situation as a means of trolling, and everyone is sick of it, myself included.

I am going to ban his ability to post until he proposes a plan to solve this, via PM (to me), and sticks to it. That is, some sort of escrow will need to have occurred before he can post again here. The escrow doesn't have to be to me.

BTW, handicapme, I don't understand your threat to donate to skatz or VPR. Go ahead and donate to them. I am not in competition with either of those forums, especially VPR.

To be honest, I had very limited time on the internet over the past 1-2 weeks, which is why my posting here was pretty much been reduced to infrequent, short messages during that time. It's also why I couldn't do radio on Tuesday. I would read some threads here and there, but didn't even get to read this one until today.

Also, anyone is welcome to quote anyone else's (actual) messages in their signature.

[Deal]

[vegas1369]

Thank you Druff.

[408Mike]

It seems clear to me that jsearles is not interested in actually settling this $500 matter.

It also seems clear that he seems to enjoy the attention that comes from the whole matter, and is intentionally dragging this out for as long as possible.

If he said, "I disagree I owe you $500, and I'm never going to pay, end of discussion", I would think he was being really shitty, but at least wasn't trying to rub salt in the wounds.

I believe he is using this situation as a means of trolling, and everyone is sick of it, myself included.

I am going to ban his ability to post until he proposes a plan to solve this, via PM (to me), and sticks to it. That is, some sort of escrow will need to have occurred before he can post again here. The escrow doesn't have to be to me.

BTW, handicapme, I don't understand your threat to donate to skatz or VPR. Go ahead and donate to them. I am not in competition with either of those forums, especially VPR.

To be honest, I had very limited time on the internet over the past 1-2 weeks, which is why my posting here was pretty much been reduced to infrequent, short messages during that time. It's also why I couldn't do radio on Tuesday. I would read some threads here and there, but didn't even get to read this one until today.

Also, anyone is welcome to quote anyone else's (actual) messages in their signature.

I give you a lot of credit for dealing with situations that can easily be dicey so easily and effectively when inj reality, for normal humans, such situations seem to have a very clear solution and it's never the right one. Searles cannot bitch about being bannedor censored and yet [in all reality he's as good as gone with the rest of the room temperature bathwater on failsite

[408Mike]

[QUOTE=408Mike;92762]

It seems clear to me that jsearles is not interested in actually settling this $500 matter.

It also seems clear that he seems to enjoy the attention that comes from the whole matter, and is intentionally dragging this out for as long as possible.

If he said, "I disagree I owe you $500, and I'm never going to pay, end of discussion", I would think he was being really shitty, but at least wasn't trying to rub salt in the wounds.

I believe he is using this situation as a means of trolling, and everyone is sick of it, myself included.

I am going to ban his ability to post until he proposes a plan to solve this, via PM (to me), and sticks to it. That is, some sort of escrow will need to have occurred before he can post again here. The escrow doesn't have to be to me.

BTW, handicapme, I don't understand your threat to donate to skatz or VPR. Go ahead and donate to them. I am not in competition with either of those forums, especially VPR.

To be honest, I had very limited time on the internet over the past 1-2 weeks, which is why my posting here was pretty much been reduced to infrequent, short messages during that time. It's also why I couldn't do radio on Tuesday. I would read some threads here and there, but didn't even get to read this one until today.

Also, anyone is welcome to quote anyone else's (actual) messages in their signature.

I give you a lot of credit for dealing with situations that can easily be dicey so easily and effectively when inj reality, for normal humans, such situations seem to have a very clear solution and it's never the right one. Searles cannot bitch about being bannedor censored and yet [in all reality he's as good as gone with the rest of the room temperature bathwater on failsite

searles is literally too stupid unlikeable and belligerent to ever be a consistent poster.

proof of his stupidity, predictably, will be failsite welcoming him with open arms, and he will think he's made friends.

I was never as dim as he is if anyone was thinking this would be a clever thing to-no. No, it's not.