Rand Paul
Christie
Trump
Hilary
Bernie
Carson
Cruz
Rubio
Bush
Kasich
Jeb posted this on twitter followed by the word "America"
I know he's just throwing windmills now as he's so far behind. But no excuse for such a desperate play.
In 100 years from now the world will judge that family as one of the most hated in human history. And i'm pretty certain of that.
Will Rubio's hairline look more like Donald Trump's or Bernie Sander's in a year?
Will Braman fund a second hair transplant for The Pool Boy?
Below Rubio recent debate
We all knew about Rubio's innocent relationship with Adelson but this Miami billionaire Braman is new to me.
In before Druff reminds us what Rubio does is politics as usual and there is nothing to see here. I leave the hair as an out.....This story is particularly troublesome for Rubio, who aims to paint himself as a fresh face on the campaign trail, by making him look like just another Washington insider doing favors for a wealthy donor.
“As Mr. Rubio has ascended in the ranks of Republican politics, Mr. Braman has emerged as a remarkable and unique patron,” the Times reporters wrote. “He has bankrolled Mr. Rubio’s campaigns. He has financed Mr. Rubio’s legislative agenda. And, at the same time, he has subsidized Mr. Rubio’s personal finances, as the rising politician and his wife grappled with heavy debt and big swings in their income.”
The Times added that Braman will be subsidizing Rubio’s presidential campaign with at least $10 million in cash, and that Rubio has used his positions in government to ensure that the “money has flowed both ways” as Braman’s pet projects get funding from taxpayers.
“Even in an era dominated by super-wealthy donors, Mr. Braman stands out, given how integral he has been not only to Mr. Rubio’s political aspirations but also to his personal finances,” the Times wrote.This story is particularly troublesome for Rubio, who aims to paint himself as a fresh face on the campaign trail, by making him look like just another Washington insider doing favors for a wealthy donor.
Seriously, is this Rubio thing a nod to some kinda Jewish Billionaire boys club?
Braman needs to step up for another round of financing with the Hair Club for Men
Last edited by Sanlmar; 02-16-2016 at 05:00 PM.
Current Poll for South Carolina...02/15/2016...Post Debate
Trump...35%
Rubio...18%
Cruz...18%
Kasich...10%
Jeb...7%
Carson...7%
Jeb might get less votes than Carson.
If he does then Jeb is fucking done.
Expect Rubio, Cruz and Kasich numbers to continue to fall.
I continue to believe that Mr. Trump will not become President.- Barack Obama
CNN says
In the Republican race, Trump, at 38%, tops Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who holds second place with 22%. Behind those two, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio garners 14% support, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is at 10%, retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson has 6% and Ohio Gov. John Kasich is at 4%
False. 38 even to 36.6 after debate. You can want him to fail all you want, but it isn't happening in real life. He is bulletproof.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-4151.html
Probably her smartest speech yet:
Dems have the choice between that and a socialist who didn't even earn a paycheck until he was 40 years old...
Just WOW
(but don't worry, vote for Bernie because shits gonna be free because he is a master of economics,ROFLCOPTER)
Last edited by Gordman; 02-16-2016 at 06:08 PM.
Is it OK for Trump to call her a bitch since she did bark on TV?
You realize those polls you quoted span the course of 5 days right? The debate being right in the middle......
Just because a poll comes out the 15th does not mean mean all the data was collected on that day...
Oh and try reading the actual polls you quote.
AB was spot on with the pre and post CNN findings...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/16/politi...orc/index.html
from the link...
The poll suggests Trump's support may have softened after Saturday's debate among the GOP candidates. In interviews conducted before the debate, 40% backed Trump, compared with 31% who said they supported him after the raucous matchup between the remaining candidates in the field. Two candidates who attempted to remain above the fray in the debate -- Carson and Kasich -- each appeared to get a bump in the post-debate interviews, though the increase for both candidates was within the margin of sampling error for the post-debate interviews.
You apparently didn't take 3 seconds to SCROLL down to the chart below those stupid numbers at the top of the page that mean nothing and I wasn't referencing. That has it day by day from Sept til today. Oh and the link is the average of ALL of the top polls, not just one here or there.
Go ahead and move the cursor across the graph and tell me what you find. Maybe look at Trumps steady rise from high 20's at the beginning of December....and then settle in the 36-38 range from about the end of December on. And the 38.0 pre debate number, followed by the 36.6 post debate rating. Not even outside the margin of error, so really no drop at all.
This idea that Trump had some huge crash is complete bullshit, that is the main point. His lead is as strong as it ever has been in SC.
Again just in case you don't understand the real clear politics graph is a simple calculation of the 4 most recent polls (by closing date not starting date). They then take an unweighted average to come up with a daily value. While that value is calculated daily the information inside will often span several days (in this case as far back as Feb 10th as the CNN poll is included). Now if we look at all three polls that were started after the debate (33,34,35,) Trump is actually at 34 percent according to RCP.
Still that's besides the original point which is that as AB pointed out the CNN poll showed a big drop before and after (granted only 400 participants).
The thing that stands out most to me though is that Bush polled at 15% Feb 15th out of the SC House GOP (n=1700). That's a huge spike and very telling that Bush is not yet done.
Do you take lessons in how to be an ignoramous, or were you born that way?
Employment in New York and Vermont
After graduating from college, Sanders initially worked in New York City in a variety of jobs, including Head Start teacher, psychiatric aide and carpenter.[34] In 1968 Sanders moved to Vermont because he had been "captivated by rural life." After his arrival there he worked as a carpenter, filmmaker and writer[35] who created and sold “radical film strips” and other educational materials to schools.[36]
Well excuse me, I forgot to say STEADY paycheck - even though you cannot even cite your copy paste bullshit
His first steady paycheck is when he ultimately found the taxpayer teat.
LOL at you using Wikipedia to cite your source. Im sure there is nobody working for Bernie who keeps watch and puts the lipstick on the pig on his Wiki
He was a fucking bum, and his friends said so.
Here, i do this in Mumbles fashion:
Sanders rented a small brick duplex at 295 1/2 Maple Street that was filled with not much furniture and not much food in the fridge but stacks of checked-out library books and scribbled-on legal pads.
"Pretty sparse," Gene Bergman, an old friend, said about the apartment.
"Stark and dark," said Darcy Troville, a fellow Liberty Unionite who lived around the corner and shared with Sanders homemade jellies and jams.
"The electricity was turned off a lot," Barnett said. "I remember him running an extension cord down to the basement. He couldn't pay his bills."
He worked some as a carpenter, although "he was a shitty carpenter," [Liberty Union party member John] Bloch told me. "His carpentry," [Liberty Union member Danny] Morrisseau said, "was not going to support him, and didn't."
He worked as a freelance writer, putting intermittent pieces in the low-budget Vermont Freeman, a Burlington alternative weekly called the Vanguard Press and a glossy, state-supported magazine called Vermont Life.
His writing wasn't a living. The Vanguard paid as little as the rest. "It would've been not more than 50 bucks," said Greg Guma, a former editor. Vermont Life? "Our rate was 10 cents a word," said Brian Vachon, a former editor.
"He was always poor," Sandy Baird, another old friend, told me in Burlington.
"Virtually unemployed," said Nelson, the political science professor at the University of Vermont.
"Just one step above hand to mouth," said Terry Bouricius, who was involved with Liberty Union, served at times as a de facto campaign manager for Sanders and at one point crashed for a couple months on his couch.
Liberty Union "people found it difficult to support themselves while engaging in full-time political work," Michael Parenti, one of those people, wrote in the Massachusetts Review in the summer of 1975. "Some held jobs that allowed free time for campaign activities, while others lived off unemployment insurance."
"His work was to be a politician," Guma said. "He put everything into what he was doing."
Now, sometimes I wouldn't have a problem with someone who was struggling running for an office, but if you're there to promote socialism and ultimately take from the people who actually MAKE a fucking living and pay the taxes...and even promote taking MORE then is already taken, and ultimately give it to the bums,that sounds like a disaster waiting to happen in my book
FUCK THAT SHIT
omg these replies
https://twitter.com/twt/status/699754419341172736
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)