Quote Originally Posted by BCR View Post
Quote Originally Posted by chinamaniac View Post
So if limitless starts posting in here and goes 23-2 that means he is good?

What is their all time record?

How did they do the last 12 months before their 1st losing day?

Something tells me we won't have an answer to #2 and #3 but I could be wrong.


Honestly, start 50 twitter accounts. Pick a different slate with all accounts. Some will run bad. Some will run good. Some will run like God. I can get 30 Vonage numbers with Vegas exchanges for $300 a month. We have all our friends from everywhere pimp our site. Being so geographically diverse, we have Drk rubbing $100's on big fake blonde titties in Chicago and thanking us for it. Admantium popping corks in Norway, Beer and Poker sitting courtside at Pistons games. We have been winning at 78.5% since 1991. Why? Because we say we have, and when anyone questions it, they got shouted down by 30 people from all over the country that attest to us being the best. It's idiotic we're not doing it already. We have exactly the right type of diverse group that could pull it off well.
I'll be the first to argue that most sports bettors aren't anywhere near as skilled as they think they are and that so many of these services are rip offs. But if this service legitimately went 23-2 you would need about 5000 not 50 twitter accounts to reproduce (assuming they did not stack up on favs). You can argue range restriction when dealing with odds like 100-1 but pretty hard when you get into p <.001 odds.

I will agree though that in general you shouldn't be paying for any service that advertises a sample size of bets less than 500 games at least.