Originally Posted by
HomerSimpson
Fluffer's assessment seems fair, but I still think the show needs to get some real name guests. I'm a new guy and I don't even know who the players are yet?
One common complaint about the show on the last site we were on involved the "name" guests.
But the complaint wasn't that we didn't have enough. It was that the segments were boring and dry.
We decided that we're not going to bend over backwards to get "known" guests unless we feel we can make an interesting segment out of it. Now, of course, a really big name in poker is always interesting, but moderately big names can be boring if they have nothing noteworthy to say.
For example, we're not going to scramble to interview some online player who happens to score a bracelet at this year's WSOP. There's really nothing interesting to say in such an interview, especially because our show doesn't discuss poker strategy.
BTW, if anyone here can assist us with getting interviews with interesting guests, PM me.