I'm not a technicality guy, and we all know what the "spirit" of the wager Vegas proposed was, but I could in no way be considered impartial as I have a strong positive opinion of Vegas, and he'll probably be the first person I will party with next time out west. I could be impartial with probably 99% of the posters here, but the first two that have been in question (Willie and Vegas) are among a small handful with which I have spoken to privately, beyond forum banter, and are simply two of the main reasons I'm even involved with the community anymore. I happen to agree with Vegas here, but in the event I didn't, I wouldn't call him out on it either, so I'm certainly biased.