Originally Posted by Daly
You don't strike me as the type of guy that $150 is going to make or break the mortgage payment you don't have.
90% of the time the best thing to do, mathematically, is to sit on your hands and watch it unfold.
You picked up .10 of value so far as the line is 44 flat.
Glgl
so much unspeakable bad luck for this to be the result. again.
did this really happen irl?
https://twitter.com/RightWingPlays/status/1965209968795373753
Zac Gallen is one of those pitchers who is streaky. When he's on, he dominates. When he's not, he's pretty bad.
Over the past 3 games, he has gone 6 innings each and allowed a TOTAL of one run. That's 1 run in the past 18 innings, with 20 K in that time.
Bonus pick on the Cardinals, to where you just need to win one of these to be profitable:
St. Louis (Liberatore) +168 at Seattle (Kirby)
Arizona (Gallen) +123 at San Francisco (Ray)
This is scary. I almost never bet mlb this time Of year. I was looking for a smallish "non sharp" play to keep a local account open and stumbled across Arizona F5.
Here is to us.
Well Todd. At least we can go to bed early knowing which Zacshowed up tonight.
When you're hot, you're hot... when you're not, you're not.
Cardinals started off ahead 2-0, fell behind 3-2, got back to 3-3, and are back down 5-3 with possibly more scoring.
Gallen didn't have it and gave up 3 before the seats got warm. That one is 4-0 and likely dead.
Bad Zac got me also. I wanted some action as I have the dreaded late summer cold and was laying around miserable. Everything else I was leaning lost also, so I would have lost if I had went with my own bet anyway.
Single
@
+123
Lost
Sep 9 • 2025 At 08:42:01 PM
Ticket ID: 954834
Moneyline: ARI Diamondbacks
ARI Diamondbacks @ SF Giants
Interesting Zac Gallen stat I heard on Phillies game last night. He and 3 of his high school teammates all made the majors as pitchers. Sure being a catholic school they recruit but still.
School: Bishop Eustace Preparatory School
Gallen
Tyler Phillips (Phillies)
Justin Hagerman (Mets)
Devin Smeltzer (Twins)
Not a whole lot to go on tonight.
I talked myself into a 1H -2.5 on GB only because the full game opened at 1 and jumped the fence which tells me the powers that be like the pack and Ill trade the 30 min of football to stay on the right side of zero.
Jumped all over wash at 3.5 with a sprinkle of +154 for the game and some WR props. Matthew Golden at +290 anytime TD looked especially good imo.
What a shame. They got away.
Want to take a closer look in the morning but we may be busy tomorrow.
Going to be a day of taking big dogs that people hate (Looking at you NW) and big chalk that people hate (Looking at you War Eagle).
I want to warn you of two things before you read below. 1. You should get a Barf Bag handy. There are some outright ugly teams we are backing. The list looks like shit, which is probably a good thing. 2. The line has moved on some of these from last night. Try and keep the important numbers in mind if you going to follow. You should be able to buy the +28 on NW cheaply. The 21 on Wisconsin is probably too far gone.
12
NW +28
NW U49.5
Wis +21
Aub -24
3:30
Ore st +23.5
Ore St O62.5
Miami -17.5
Miami U 56.5
Usc -21 P
Texas -41
Ill have some 7PM later
I had the Auburn one all ready. My Wiscy is at 19.5, so probably pass. Is something up with NW? My book has it off the board atm 20 minutes before kick? Strange
Thanks for your thoughts as always
Edit-just put it back up at 28 and 50.
28 was -137 so I took a pass. Under 50 was -110, so on that. Good luck to all/
Myself I’m on Memphis also. Feel like the Troy love is overreaction to playing Clemson close, but don’t think much of Clemson. We will see. Bit of contrarian play
I had Auburn over points. So sick. They only had the ball twice the whole second half (S. Ala only had it 3 times) and 3 points. Auburn defense couldn't really get off the field, and both teams were content to just run out the clock the second half, so that is what they did.
The new weather delay over-precautions are becoming a real problem. One lightning strike 10 miles away and game delayed an hour. Most of these delays there isn't even any rain the storm is so far away.
So at the weigh in Crawford looked pretty solid at 167. I dont think anyone questions that he is the better boxer, it is just a matter of whether that is too heavy for him to box effectively at.
Any strong objections to taking him at +135?
--As a side note, he was +185 before the weigh in. I think a lot of people had the same idea as me, they wanted to see how he looked at the weigh in, and once they saw he seemed to be carrying the weight well they took him.
Here is the 7 slate for me
7
W Mich +27.5
W mich O 51.5
Ark/miss U 60.5
UK -23.5 P
FAU +3 P
Ge sou -3 P
Ohio +30
ND -6.5
Tela,
I haven’t bet it yet. Start a thread professing your deep admiration and respect for Bibi Netanyahu and really sell it to me and I will abstain.
hey fucktard, this is a gambling thread, take your political shit elsewhere, it has no place here.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
