Actually I used to believe this as well. Now I want curriculum in all schools strictly controlled by the Trump Administration. A Curriculum Czar overseen by Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginny, would be amazing.Originally Posted by Jayjami
I’m a teacher. Trump is right on this one. Education should strictly be a state matter.
Love how we went from build the wall, to fuck it, we’ll just deport them all!!
Last edited by TheXFactor; 11-14-2024 at 04:36 PM.
Mexico and Elon are refusing to pay for the wall.
When faced with a difficult decision, ask yourself "What would Micon do?", then do the opposite.
PFA Rookie of the Year Awards
2012: The Templar (unknown)
2013: Jasep $5000+
2015: Micon's gofundme legal defense $3k begging for 100k:
2018: 4Dragons
2019: Dutch Boyd: Mike Postle
2020: Covid19
2021: SMIFlorida and some sort of shit coins for $50k
2023: 22nd Feb 4th Dec Youtube channels removed
2024: Dustin Morgan wins Chrissy's $1000 contest: May 3rd another channel gone.
Agreed. The way education is currently structured is fundamentally flawed. This situation might encourage states to explore alternative approaches. We've all simply accepted the traditional model of students sitting in a classroom, being lectured to, and expected to learn more or less at the same pace. However, for this method to work, all students would need to progress at roughly the same rate, which isn't how it works. Instead, curriculums should be individualized, allowing students to advance at a pace that matches their capabilities. They simply do not move forward with what they are working on until they master that specific subject and pass the exams associated with them. Yes, this would mean some kids might take 2 more years to graduate, but it would also allow 15 year old with high IQs to blast through high school curriculum not waiting for their peers. It would also leads to much better scores all around for all kids.I’m a teacher. Trump is right on this one. Education should strictly be a state matter.
The biggest problem in education isn’t teachers. Most of them are competent like what they do. It’s the inflexible curriculum that requires them to teach to the lowest common denominator.Agreed. The way education is currently structured is fundamentally flawed. This situation might encourage states to explore alternative approaches. We've all simply accepted the traditional model of students sitting in a classroom, being lectured to, and expected to learn more or less at the same pace. However, for this method to work, all students would need to progress at roughly the same rate, which isn't how it works. Instead, curriculums should be individualized, allowing students to advance at a pace that matches their capabilities. They simply do not move forward with what they are working on until they master that specific subject and pass the exams associated with them. Yes, this would mean some kids might take 2 more years to graduate, but it would also allow 15 year old with high IQs to blast through high school curriculum not waiting for their peers. It would also leads to much better scores all around for all kids.
There is nothing inflexible about math, science and unedited history. The reason the school system has gone awry is left wing lunatics trying to teach critical race theory and social awareness to 10 year olds. You just don't get it. 4 years of Trump will get your head right. And if that doesn't 8 years of JD Vance will.The biggest problem in education isn’t teachers. Most of them are competent like what they do. It’s the inflexible curriculum that requires them to teach to the lowest common denominator.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 15 guests)
Reply With Quote