
Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
I'm kinda leaning toward "free speech grift", which is sad because higher education really does need a complete reset.
However, many of the people involved have made careers out of being cancel culture victims, so this whole thing is a bit suspect. I want to see a free speech university created for the love of the game, not as a money grab because the university libs have pissed off enough conversatives to where such a thing would be profitable.
I think the problem here is the fact that it's a university which centers itself around free speech, rather than being a regular university which promises to welcome free speech. The former seems somewhat like a grift, whereas the latter is sorely needed.
I keep seeing variants of this statement that "higher education needs a complete reset" but what does that actually mean? Certainly aspects of universities need to be reformed but what, practically speaking, do you think a "complete reset" of post-secondary education would look like?
And I think you've nailed it by saying that universities need to welcome free speech rather than building around it. We're already seeing the predictable ridicule of UATX for just being a free speech university:
All that being said, I would take the shit out of a David Mamet play writing course.