Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
You are incorrect.
You can only be held criminally liable if they can link your deposit with an intent to fund criminal activity.
For example, let's say I e-mailed you, "Hey, I want to rob a bank next week, but can't afford a gun. Can you put $600 in my account so I can buy one?" If you agreed and then put $600 in my account, and later the police found our messages back and forth discussing what I would do with the $600, then you would be criminally liable.
But let's say you just decided to be nice and put $600 in my account because you like my radio show and wanted to show your appreciation. And then I go take out the $600 and buy a gun to rob a bank with it. You could NOT be held liable, as you were not knowingly funding criminal activity. It is absurd to say that you bear responsibility for what someone does with money after you gave it to them, if you originally gave the money for innocent purposes.
In this case, there is a long electronic trail of you owing the $1000 for a friendly wager related to poker, so there's no way you could ever be held responsible for what is done with that cash. Even if George subsequently shipped the money to ISIS to fund the next beheading, you would have a reasonable answer in that you owed this money as a result of a bet, and could prove it.
This is a ridiculous excuse on your part. If you feel I'm wrong, link me to a law on the books which supports your point.
Regardless, it is painfully obvious to me and everyone that you are dodging this debt. Your excuses are absurd, and this has dragged for months. There are many legal ways to transfer money which put you at ZERO risk, and you refuse. Instead, you keep demanding that the person meet you at a casino during a narrow window of time, and then when they agree, you don't show up.
Only a complete idiot would believe you are anything but a welcher here.
Rather than make idiotic excuses, why not just agree to a payment plan and be done with it?