How many poker players believed in this garbage?
https://twitter.com/casino_examiner/...2633986965504?
Printable View
How many poker players believed in this garbage?
https://twitter.com/casino_examiner/...2633986965504?
Pretty sure Dnegs would back it up. How else do you explain KidPokers ability to call peoples hands exactly at a rate that makes zero logical sense?Quote:
Originally Posted by JSTAT
Edit: Yikes Jstat you got torched in NVG over that thread man.. I dont know whether to feel bad for you over being gangtackled by the NVGtards or not.
The 2+2 users baited me and I responded with respect even while being torched by Brunson fanboys. Hope the lurkers learned a thing or two from me to protect their bankrolls.
Dude has been pushing his nonsense for decades, looking for attention.
He’s up there with the biggest lunatics over the years on these forums. We all have our lists but he’s up there with…
Bill Yung
Egalite
Bacc Master
Junket King
You name them, from Gamblers Glen to John Patrick’s site, these lunatics push their anti math garbage from their dying beds thinking someone cares.
If it gives them a moment’s happiness in their irrelevant lives, more power to them. They are as harmless as they are pathetic.
This guy is right up there with the best of them. Hopefully someone cares enough to get him his meds.
.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
My math is backed by the head of Statistics at Cal State East Bay Mike Orkin. Peter Griffin from “The Theory of Blackjack” and former math professor at Cal State Sacramento. The Math is on my YouTube Channel. Besides my blackjack play was extra income. Never was a user at Gamblers Glenn or John Patrick’s site. Thanks for the pleasantries.
Not gonna lie made me giggle when I heard Peter Griffin mentioned. Yes it went to family guy immediately.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSTAT.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
My math is backed by the head of Statistics at Cal State East Bay Mike Orkin. Peter Griffin from “The Theory of Blackjack” and former math professor at Cal State Sacramento. The Math is on my YouTube Channel. Besides my blackjack play was extra income. Never was a user at Gamblers Glenn or John Patrick’s site. Thanks for the pleasantries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSTAT.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
My math is backed by the head of Statistics at Cal State East Bay Mike Orkin. Peter Griffin from “The Theory of Blackjack” and former math professor at Cal State Sacramento. The Math is on my YouTube Channel. Besides my blackjack play was extra income. Never was a user at Gamblers Glenn or John Patrick’s site. Thanks for the pleasantries.
What do all these folks think of your Baccarat “JSTAT Count” from 2012?
What does gambling mathematician Elliot Jacobson think of the JSTAT count?
What does a 100 MILLION hand computer simulation think of the JSTAT Count? LOL (Sorry, I just had to)
You claimed if you bet on Banker at a count of +8, this would produce an advantage.
Gambling Mathematician, Elliot Jacobson analyzed your system here:
https://www.888casino.com/blog/bacca...-flim-flam?amp
The banker bet has a 1.05% house edge. Your claim was that at +8, you would gain an advantage.
After Jacobsons analysis he determine your JSTAT count did NOT have a player edge. Not only did your system not produce a +EV outcome - It actually INCREASED the HOUSE edge!
I have made many mistakes in my life, and I am sure I will make many more before I die. When you realized you are wrong about something it’s best to come out and say so. You challenged Elliot further by claiming you would pput up $10k in some sort of contest.
I asked you about this a couple years ago on this forum, in the Christopher Mitchell thread. Instead of saying, “Yes, I acknowledge my JSTAT count is not +EV for Baccarat”. Instead of this you bring up how betting the Dragon 7 side bet is +EV. Yes, it is, this is well known among AP’s. I find it funny that Elliot Jacobson, the same person that did the analysis on your JSTAT system is the one who publicly introduced the Dragon 7 side count to the world as well as the AP community. Elliot published his article on WOV and demonstrated the facts that it was beatable. Casinos even temporary shut down the Dragon 7 side bet because of Elliot’s article.
Are you willing to finally acknowledge that your Baccarat JSTAT count is not +EV?
You will get much more respect if you do this. I give you credit for coming out with a strategy/system/count that you thought would be Positive Expectation. This is not easy as you open yourself up to criticism. When it becomes obvious that it’s NOT +EV, you must admit as much.
PostiveVariance: Here’s proof of beating EZ Baccarat’s Dragon 7 side bet instead of using ESP. More to come after wiping out a few casinos when I am done with them. Baccarat can beaten with card counting, but not now. I can say if an equal 2’s and 3’s left in the shoe, a Player advantage exists. Same with 7’s and 8’s for Banker. Jacobson is entitled to his opinion whether he is right or wrong.
https://youtu.be/CFGMk3wtI0M
“ JSTAT: Maybe ESP will work or I’m hiding something that will knock your socks off”
I’ll go with voodoo. So how many forums are you going to post that same garbage on looking for attention? In the past month you have posted the same garbage everywhere, and then come here after the poker players. And it’s just copies of stuff you posted decades ago over and over again.
If you have something that gives you an advantage, go out and make yourself rich. Instead you look for attention on forums. How does that make any sense?
I’ll stick with my earlier claim you are right up there with all Bacc crazies over the years. Hell maybe you are some of them. One thing you all have in common is you are made to look like asses when someone like Elliot looks at the claims.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1edqWrtXMo
JSTAT, I know the Dragon 7 side bet is beatable. No one is saying otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSTAT
You are using this to draw attention away from your JSTAT count for the main Bacarrat bet.
I think once you realized the JSTAT count doesn't work you basically said "well the Dragon 7 count does work".
No one is disputing this! It's very well know the Dragon 7 side count is +EV. Every serious AP on the planet is aware of the Dragon 7 being +EV.
Are you ready to say the JSTAT count for counting Bacarrats main game is -EV?
Also, even though the Dragon 7 is beatable, a 5 min video doesn't mean anything. The variance for the Dragon 7 side bet is very high due to the 40:1 payout.
For the record, I am VERY familiar with these Northern California cardrooms as it's my home turf. There are advantages there, right under your nose that are FAR greater than the Dragon 7 side bet.
Are you ready to acknowledge your JSTAT count is not effective WITHOUT bringing up Elliot Jacobsons "Dragon 7 count"?