Let's mix it up...Queen and Slim was a chef's kiss.
Printable View
Let's mix it up...Queen and Slim was a chef's kiss.
Repealing their exemption will have no effect on their ability to censor posts if they want to. None.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
LOL. You're proving just how stupid you are. Bone up on your reading comprehension then read what I wrote over and over again until you get it. I never argued they don't have a right to censor. I simply stated that they took the federal exemption from lawsuits over what people write. But they choose to censor anyway. They are not censoring to protect themselves from lawsuits. They are censoring to influence political beliefs. They are far left activists. Consequently, they should be stripped of the federal exemption from liability in lawsuits.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
The problem with censoring "misinformation" is who decides what is misinformation? Twitter decided that the New York Post story reporting Hunter Biden was under investigation was misinformation. Then after the election it comes out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. Twitter clearly lied about it being misinformation.
Big tech is being legally protected by the exemption from those they censor. Those that get censored should be given back their due process by taking away big tech's exemption. Then big tech can censor all they want and I don't give a damn.
Congress needs to repeal big techs exemption.
Go join parler and whatever other right-wing shithole social media there is out there and you can sit in an echo chamber of misinformation and stupidity to your heart's content.
Finally someone got arrested- Michigan State Police arrest celebrated Democratic official on six felony charges of election fraud
Are you again posting old news? What’s with the finally? Really deceptive as you’re implying it has something to do with the current case?Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
This arrest happened long before this election, at least a year ago, and involved the 2018 election.
lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by BCRAre you again posting old news? What’s with the finally? Really deceptive as you’re implying it has something to do with the current case?Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
This arrest happened long before this election, at least a year ago, and involved the 2018 election.
these idiots...
The date of the story is December 12, 2020, so watch out as this is the foundation of more arrests and the 2020 election.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRAre you again posting old news? What’s with the finally? Really deceptive as you’re implying it has something to do with the current case?Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
This arrest happened long before this election, at least a year ago, and involved the 2018 election.
No, that’s a crap site meant to be intentionally deceptive. Here is a link. Notice her age hasn’t changed? That’s not a new arrest and you’re posting old shit acting like it just happened for the second time today.
I mean here is a link to the arrest from 9/2019.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fox...ud-charges.amp
LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by BCR
THESE IDIOTS...
Its a starting point. The first of many arrests to come.
It’s not a starting point to anything besides proving you’re either an asshole or the stupidest fucker alive getting fooled twice in one day by old news. It actually shows Michigan was up on their voter fraud detection long before this election.Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
You realize this is from 2018 and has nothing to do with this year, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
My god you are stupid. Where do we find these people.Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
Already been addressed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakYou realize this is from 2018 and has nothing to do with this year, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
OK let's make a bet.Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
If any election official or voting machine company employee is convicted, today or any time in the next year, for tampering with votes in the 2020 election (not some other election), for the purpose of changing the result from Trump to Biden, you get $1,000.
If not, I get $1,000.
Escrow with Druff.
Yes, it has been addressed that you are stupid and were hoodwinked by an intentional deception.Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunnerAlready been addressed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
Biden won FAIR AND SQUARE
DEAL WITH IT
They did, they came here,Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakRepealing their exemption will have no effect on their ability to censor posts if they want to. None.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Go join parler and whatever other right-wing shithole social media there is out there and you can sit in an echo chamber of misinformation and stupidity to your heart's content.
Here's an analogy for you. You walk into a bar and every other minute yell out kike kike, dirty fucking kikes. You have every right to do this but the owner is losing business fast and has the right to keep you out of his/her/other establishment. You're only “censored” in this one bar so far so take your dumb ass where other dumb asses congregate and we’ll all be happyQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYes, censorship exists in private media. Twitter, youtube, facebook do it all day everyday. The problem is these companies are exempt from the liabilities of normal publishers under the Communications Decency Act. They aren't responsible for any "misinformation" but are censoring WHAT THEY SAY IS MISINFORMATION anyway. If they are going to censor then they should not have any exemptions from the CDA and have to answer to lawsuits like any other publisher. Big Tech saves millions in legal fee's because of the exemption.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
One very egregious example of censorship under the guise of "eliminating misinformation" was when Twitter blocked the New York Post story, that Hunter Biden was under investigation. NYP's account was blocked for two weeks. Twitter called the story "misinformation." Facebook pulled the same shit. So now that the election is over it turns out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. So Twitter and Facebook's statements that the story was "misinformation" was itself misinformation. THEY LIED TO US.
If they are going to pull that kind of bullshit then they need to lose their federal protection from lawsuits. Congress should take it away from them.
See the difference. Your nasty language is offensive to most and you can't continue with it in my bar or in privately owned businesses etc. That's why it's not censorship
Dude, you really are mind-bogglingly stooooooopid. I never argued that repealing their exemption would have an effect of their ability to censor. All you did here was repeat what I said. You are so libtard stupid that you want to disagree but in fact are agreeing with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakRepealing their exemption will have no effect on their ability to censor posts if they want to. None.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Go join parler and whatever other right-wing shithole social media there is out there and you can sit in an echo chamber of misinformation and stupidity to your heart's content.
I'm in an echo chamber of misinformation and stupidity right here at PFA with it's brain-dead libtards thinking they are smart. So I really don't have to go anywhere. But you need to. Fuck off. Hit the road, dumazz.
Anything but admit that voter fraud is going on. Libtards won't change on the issue until THEY get cheated. Then you'll hear some very loud wailing going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickLMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by BCR
THESE IDIOTS...
You can't be serious. Your "analogy" is not an analogy at all. A bar patron hurling racial slurs is disturbing the peace. The New York Post was just reporting the news in a lawful manner. Twitter labeled it misinformation when it actually wasn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesHere's an analogy for you. You walk into a bar and every other minute yell out kike kike, dirty fucking kikes. You have every right to do this but the owner is losing business fast and has the right to keep you out of his/her/other establishment. You're only “censored” in this one bar so far so take your dumb ass where other dumb asses congregate and we’ll all be happyQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
See the difference. Your nasty language is offensive to most and you can't continue with it in my bar or in privately owned businesses etc. That's why it's not censorship