Printable View
Are you just writing off all violence done at Trump rallies as fake news or antifas fault now since 'the right isn't violent'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Those are really your only two options since admitting you were wrong is obviously off the table.
He's too much of a cuck to actually try this, but please one time let it be true. I would love to see him dragged out.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
I didn't realize you're such an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by desertrunner
1/60 in court due to A COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE and RIDICULOUS LEGAL THEORIES.
Biden won FAIR AND SQUARE
COPE MORE
The amount of political violence from the right in 2020 is a tiny fraction of the political violence from the left.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanAre you just writing off all violence done at Trump rallies as fake news or antifas fault now since 'the right isn't violent'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Those are really your only two options since admitting you were wrong is obviously off the table.
I have never claimed that there is NO right-wing political violence -- only that it is infrequent compared to the horrible left-wing violence we have seen throughout 2020.
I have offered tangible, easy-to-settle bets regarding the political affiliation of those arrested at 2020 political protests (for violent crime only -- not minor crimes like failure to disperse), and nobody will take me up on it.
Any honest person with a functioning brain knows which side was primarily responsible for the violence and destruction this year. It's sad that you can't admit this, for fear that it will somehow ruin your arguments about other political matters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffThe amount of political violence from the right in 2020 is a tiny fraction of the political violence from the left.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
I have never claimed that there is NO right-wing political violence -- only that it is infrequent compared to the horrible left-wing violence we have seen throughout 2020.
I have offered tangible, easy-to-settle bets regarding the political affiliation of those arrested at 2020 political protests (for violent crime only -- not minor crimes like failure to disperse), and nobody will take me up on it.
Any honest person with a functioning brain knows which side was primarily responsible for the violence and destruction this year. It's sad that you can't admit this, for fear that it will somehow ruin your arguments about other political matters.
Come on Druff, you arent this much of a simpleton really are you....
The left is way, way more in numbers then is the 'Right' or Republicans. And Repubs are generally always a wealthy type, and educated, they arent the ones you'd expect to act unruly when they dont get what they want, duh.
Now the poor uneducated inner city folks, which are largely what the 'Left" is. Liberal minded Democrats, now of course they can be expected to act foolishly lol.. When something they dont want to happen does, like Trump winning the election in 2016, things can get bitter then. But lol to act like the oh so Perfect, 'Right' republicans do everything oh so right, thats total bullshit because the Right is generally the wealthier more educated bunch anyway. Duh alot of this is just common sense man, dont be such a simpleton dude....
=)
whose angry drunk facebook dad is desertrunner?
“I’m very, very concerned that if you solicit votes from typically non-voters, that you will affect and change the outcome.”
- Rand Paul
republicans, tell me more about how stoked you are that trump is ending the world?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
the odds that "the elite" or the illuminati or the freemasons or whatever are trying to self fulfill prophecy and force God's hand in their minds might be as high as like 15%. much higher than my .02% odds of dying of that manmade virus that Im 95% sure i already had so im 100% out on that mRNA vaccine which is tied to that contract tracing bill that they named "6666" good lord i need a drink
100% biowarfare by China.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
the odds that "the elite" or the illuminati or the freemasons or whatever are trying to self fulfill prophecy and force God's hand in their minds might be as high as like 15%. much higher than my .02% odds of dying of that manmade virus that Im 95% sure i already had so im 100% out on that mRNA vaccine which is tied to that contract tracing bill that they named "6666" good lord i need a drink
And another thing, why have I never had a fortune cookie that wasn't stale?Quote:
Originally Posted by splitthis100% biowarfare by China.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
and another thing, what kind of theatrical scam is this: the left screams "muh russia!! stole the election" after trump wins and now the right is supposed to be all "muh china!!" after biden. i am not participating in that because that seems like such a comically fake script
Druff has to paint the Lincoln Project guys as grifters in order to try to rationalize supporting a la false equivalency the greatest political grifter in American history to-date (Donald Trump) while simultaneously distracting himself from the important substantive criticisms of Trump’s deep and pervasive criminality and self-serving anti-democratic fascistic demagogery.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanAre you just writing off all violence done at Trump rallies as fake news or antifas fault now since 'the right isn't violent'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Those are really your only two options since admitting you were wrong is obviously off the table.
Sanlmar: Funny videos. They were a hit. It’s a funny line Druff takes here. Never understood it.
Yes, censorship exists in private media. Twitter, youtube, facebook do it all day everyday. The problem is these companies are exempt from the liabilities of normal publishers under the Communications Decency Act. They aren't responsible for any "misinformation" but are censoring WHAT THEY SAY IS MISINFORMATION anyway. If they are going to censor then they should not have any exemptions from the CDA and have to answer to lawsuits like any other publisher. Big Tech saves millions in legal fee's because of the exemption.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
One very egregious example of censorship under the guise of "eliminating misinformation" was when Twitter blocked the New York Post story, that Hunter Biden was under investigation. NYP's account was blocked for two weeks. Twitter called the story "misinformation." Facebook pulled the same shit. So now that the election is over it turns out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. So Twitter and Facebook's statements that the story was "misinformation" was itself misinformation. THEY LIED TO US.
If they are going to pull that kind of bullshit then they need to lose their federal protection from lawsuits. Congress should take it away from them.
:thisQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYes, censorship exists in private media. Twitter, youtube, facebook do it all day everyday. The problem is these companies are exempt from the liabilities of normal publishers under the Communications Decency Act. They aren't responsible for any "misinformation" but are censoring WHAT THEY SAY IS MISINFORMATION anyway. If they are going to censor then they should not have any exemptions from the CDA and have to answer to lawsuits like any other publisher. Big Tech saves millions in legal fee's because of the exemption.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
One very egregious example of censorship under the guise of "eliminating misinformation" was when Twitter blocked the New York Post story, that Hunter Biden was under investigation. NYP's account was blocked for two weeks. Twitter called the story "misinformation." Facebook pulled the same shit. So now that the election is over it turns out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. So Twitter and Facebook's statements that the story was "misinformation" was itself misinformation. THEY LIED TO US.
If they are going to pull that kind of bullshit then they need to lose their federal protection from lawsuits. Congress should take it away from them.
Saw a funny video, trump being wheeled out by moving men couldn't find the video though,
As usual you have no idea what you're talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYes, censorship exists in private media. Twitter, youtube, facebook do it all day everyday. The problem is these companies are exempt from the liabilities of normal publishers under the Communications Decency Act. They aren't responsible for any "misinformation" but are censoring WHAT THEY SAY IS MISINFORMATION anyway. If they are going to censor then they should not have any exemptions from the CDA and have to answer to lawsuits like any other publisher. Big Tech saves millions in legal fee's because of the exemption.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
One very egregious example of censorship under the guise of "eliminating misinformation" was when Twitter blocked the New York Post story, that Hunter Biden was under investigation. NYP's account was blocked for two weeks. Twitter called the story "misinformation." Facebook pulled the same shit. So now that the election is over it turns out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. So Twitter and Facebook's statements that the story was "misinformation" was itself misinformation. THEY LIED TO US.
If they are going to pull that kind of bullshit then they need to lose their federal protection from lawsuits. Congress should take it away from them.
The social media platforms are private enterprises and can censor anything they damn well please. They're not require to let people speak on their platform and they can pick and choose. Fox News isn't required to let me on their air to call them all a bunch of lying faggots either.
It has literally nothing to do with the CDA.
Justice Matters
From Herd Immunity to Criminal Liability for Trump & Pence for Avoidable Coronavirus Deaths
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI9982IKpO4
LOL. You're proving just how stupid you are. Bone up on your reading comprehension then read what I wrote over and over again until you get it. I never argued they don't have a right to censor. I simply stated that they took the federal exemption from lawsuits over what people write. But they choose to censor anyway. They are not censoring to protect themselves from lawsuits. They are censoring to influence political beliefs. They are far left activists. Consequently, they should be stripped of the federal exemption from liability in lawsuits.Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter SobchakAs usual you have no idea what you're talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
The social media platforms are private enterprises and can censor anything they damn well please. They're not require to let people speak on their platform and they can pick and choose. Fox News isn't required to let me on their air to call them all a bunch of lying faggots either.
It has literally nothing to do with the CDA.
The problem with censoring "misinformation" is who decides what is misinformation? Twitter decided that the New York Post story reporting Hunter Biden was under investigation was misinformation. Then after the election it comes out that Hunter has been under investigation for almost two years. Twitter clearly lied about it being misinformation.
Big tech is being legally protected by the exemption from those they censor. Those that get censored should be given back their due process by taking away big tech's exemption. Then big tech can censor all they want and I don't give a damn.
Congress needs to repeal big techs exemption.