Printable View
Plaintiff A
suggests that information produced and presented by any on-line entity
is somehow protected from scrutiny la la la.
Scrutiny includes the source. Re-posting presumes ownership.
I asked a ten year old nephew if he thought anonymity trumped unlawful behavior and he just waived me off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
https://i.imgur.com/l2bv3c6.png
there is no fucking way youre allowed to be around a 10 year old.
If Kamala were in office, the Texas girls camp tragedy would have occurred just the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
This was a local/state level failure, in various ways.
But the left/media of course decided to exploit it the same way the exploit every other recent tragedy -- blame it on Trump.
"Never let a good crisis go to waste"
Anyway, go see the thread I linked on page 1, where I posted about other unfortunate results stemming from the Online Safety Act.
I am shocked at how many western "liberals" seem perfectly content with government censorship and control of the internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
the conflation of liberalism and intellectualism is a hallmark of the rights enduring war against lucidity.
likewise you're not allowed to be anywhere near a metaphorQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by limitles
there is no fucking way youre allowed to be around a 10 year old.
It always ends this way
Oh Jose do you see?
Todge literally has redcoats running around his hate site an insane development
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
im not doing this with you right now, i just discovered alibaba sells mini excavators and im going to be pretty locked in for the foreseeable future
What is amusing is Americans still hold some belief that they got it right.
Look up. Everyone is either level or passing your Ozempic school shooting way of life. Look no further. You hillbillies elected a serial sexual offender/lifetime grifter to office for a second term.
Dumb or greedy which is it?
No one respects this choice.
BTW, the author of this thread does not provide any information regarding the Online Safety Act.
What does it entail? Can ankles be shown?
It seems obvious the author's name appears in this legislation
Literally wearing threadbare custom made redcoats from their heyday 2013 Thailand actually insane what ur permitting right now todd
Ironically, the trail left by on-line participants is more or less complete.
Simple suspicion voids any and all personal freedoms you may entertain.
Unless you're elected to high office of course.
Bad boys, Bad boys, whatcha gonna do when they come for you.
King of American rights and freedoms. Alex Jones
Make sure to cite U.S.A. V Jones
Freedom of Speech? Sure. Without consequences. No.
Pretending that online accountability leads to political prosecution is the greatest laugh. An American citizen in fear of their political affiliations is fiction. I don't know if the Online Safety Act demands statements of political affiliation but yeah. Fuck ups
The story is incomplete. Must one register to make a Home Despot purchase? Home Despot already requires that?
Most employers have access to publicly available databases.
Less scrutinized are social gathering enterprises.
Too bad so sad if you hooked up with a decent looking psychopath.
Check out the Law and Crime Network. They're busy.
I sleep well knowing liberals are too busy not procreating along with ruining their gonads via transgenderism.
Was a difficult old school wank yesterday morning without the midget porn to help …
The hilarious thing is and multiple videos have been posted online that a simple VPN will defeat this stupidity by the Muslim Rape gang appologist' government of Starmer their idiotic age verification law. The fact the people of the UK cant figure out what the real purpose of the law is sad.
Its not about protecting kids its about giving the govt a shit ton of data to make it easier to find and arrest those who dare speak out against the Govt policies. I wonder how far away the UK is from a V is for Vendetta/Guy Fawkes moment in history again.
To be fair, it’s happening in a lot of red states in the U.S. too….Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryback_feed_me_more
Dumb.Quote:
We will use AI to interpret a variety of signals that help us to determine whether a user is over or under 18. These signals include the types of videos a user is searching for, the categories of videos they have watched, or the longevity of the account.
When the system identifies a teen user, we’ll automatically apply our age-appropriate experiences and protections, including:
- disabling personalized advertising
- turning on digital wellbeing tools
- adding safeguards to recommendations, including limiting repetitive views of some kinds of content
If the system incorrectly estimates a user to be under 18, they will have the option to verify that they are 18 or over, such as using a credit card or a government ID. We will only allow users who have been inferred or verified as over 18 to view age-restricted content that may be inappropriate for younger users.
Porn isn't even allowed on YouTube.
I'll have to advise Benjamin to start watching PFA Radio, as my average audience age is about 50.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
yeah the whole thing is astounding. plus they reallllly tap dance around where/how all this PII data is getting stored.
or who they are going to sell it to.
or if they are going to eventually use it combined with user histories to train their own AI.
[ rubs temple ]
this is a google bull thesis isnt it...
Dumb? You're an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
You can't say the word "shit" on American broadcasting/TV/radio
You can't drink till age 21?
The beauty of no regulations is that profiteers can make it up as they go along.
Regulations are meant to protect the unsuspecting harp seal
pup from the deranged jaws of a lemon shark.
You can touch a miner, just not a minor miner
Todd bumped his own reply btw. What is happening?